How much Cherokee is he?
The older Cherokee lady named as Tribal Councilor Bill John Baker’s great-grandmother on his (campaign) brochure is my great-grandmother, too.
Ebben, my grandfather; Nancy Osage; Phillip Osage; and Mary Osage are all listed on the Dawes Rolls. Nancy was less than a full blood. She was married approximately five times. One gentleman was a Frenchman by the name of Dubois. Out of that union came Audey Baker, who was less than half Cherokee.
Audey married a white man, out of which came Tim Baker, who was then less than a fourth Cherokee. Tim married a white woman and had children, so John must be less than an eighth Cherokee.
My mother is Mary Osage Helton. She’s 96 and still living. She still talks about how difficult her life was with Audey Baker and John Carey as an aunt and uncle. How little they helped her and her family when they went through difficult times. Nancy Walker was married to men with the following last names: Osage, Dubois, Carey, Leathers and Tiner.
I may have misspelled a name; something might be slightly incorrect, but if it is, it’s not out of trying to tell something that’s not true. I am telling my story from things that I learned from my mother.
I am writing out of concern for the Cherokee people’s having the best person to lead them into an unsure future. Rather than being from a family known for self-promotion, I feel that I want someone who has demonstrated a real concern for the Cherokee people to lead the tribe.
This information was unsolicited. I want the Cherokee people to have the opportunity to know how little Cherokee Mr. Baker really is. In my opinion John Baker needs to make his Certificate Degree of Indian Blood card information public.
Editor’s Note: Tribal Councilor Bill John Baker is listed in the Cherokee Nation Registration as having one-thirty second degree of Cherokee blood. Former Principal Chief John Ross was listed at one-eighth Cherokee, while Principal Chief W.W. Keeler was also one-thirty second. Former Principal Chief Ross Swimmer is listed as one-quarter, while Wilma Mankiller was half Cherokee. Current Principal Chief Chad Smith is listed at half Cherokee, too. The Cherokee Nation does not have a blood quantum for citizenship or for holding office. Citizens only need to have a Cherokee blood ancestor listed on the Final Dawes Rolls.
The 2015 general election season is ramping up and candidates, campaigns and citizens are tuning in to what will likely be a contentious competition for seats in the administration and the Tribal Council.
Each candidate will try to convince you of their virtues while their campaign attempts to denigrate their competition. Many things will be said – some true, some not – to win support from voters. Many things will change during the coming months as voters listen and decide how they will cast their votes, and our government has new faces and ideas.
But one thing will not change: The Cherokee Phoenix will continue to be a source of accurate and unbiased news and information.
Since the passage of the Independent Press Act in 2000, the Cherokee Phoenix has been mandated by law to “report without bias the activities of the government and the news of interest to have informed citizens.” The act does not specify how we should accomplish this mission but provides some tools and direction to reach this goal. In the past 15 years we have gradually added strategic plans, policies and features to add structure and consistency to this mission.
The members of the Editorial Board, the executive editor and Cherokee Phoenix staff are prohibited from participating in political activities. This prohibition is specified in the act and although it does not guarantee the removal of bias, it does at least remove the appearance of impropriety.
Editorial policies have been enacted by the Editorial Board to provide sound guidance in the acceptance or denial of letters and columns submitted for publishing. These policies have been gradually strengthened in recent years to include prohibitions on untruthful or unverifiable claims, insulting someone’s character and political lobbying.
Advertising policies have also been enacted to ensure that political advertisements are labeled to include who paid for the ad and the relevant contact information. This should provide readers and voters with necessary information about who is placing an ad and for what purpose.
All candidates for any Cherokee Nation office can publish a free campaign announcement in the newspaper. To avoid the appearance of favoritism, the Cherokee Phoenix does not cover campaign events or rallies. Instead, we offer equal campaign publicity to all candidates through an announcement written in the candidate’s own words.
A “Meet the Candidates” guide will be published in the June 2015 newspaper. The guide will consist of responses received to a questionnaire we send to all filed candidates for Tribal Council. This guide provides a level playing field for all candidates to respond to the same questions about issues affecting the CN and its citizens.
The Cherokee Phoenix will also host a public debate between the candidates for principal and deputy chief. The debate, which will be attended by a live audience as well as broadcast live on the Internet, will provide all candidates a fair opportunity to respond to questions and offer their perspectives on important issues.
In addition to everything mentioned, the Cherokee Phoenix will also be devoting a substantial amount of news coverage to many of the issues raised during the campaign season to provide greater detail or important context to statements that deserve more than just a “sound bite.” The Cherokee Phoenix staff is required to report in a way that honors the journalistic ethics of accuracy and fairness, and this will be true of all election coverage.
One element of this coverage will be in the form of a “Truth Report” that will be published as necessary in the newspaper. This report will examine public statements made by candidates, and provide feedback to our readers about its accuracy or authenticity based on our independent investigation of the statement. We began publishing the Truth Report in 2011 at the suggestion of Editorial Board Chair John Shurr, and we have received much praise from readers who value an impartial assessment of campaign rhetoric.
These policies and features to ensure fairness did not happen overnight, but are the results of years of journalism experience working within a tribal setting. I believe that ethical reporting and fairness must be the guiding principles that determine how we conduct ourselves and perform our duties. The Cherokee people and our readers have come to rely on us as a vital source of news and information about Cherokee society, history and language.
The CN was the first Indian Nation to enact a tribal press and to publish a newspaper for Cherokee people by Cherokee people. The legacy of the Cherokee Phoenix – a legacy that we still forge today – must always be one of truth before rumor, fairness before bias, and principles before politics. The Cherokee people have come to depend on it, and we must always be committed to delivering it.
As we begin a new year, we are blessed to open a chapter of new possibilities and reflect on successes in 2014. The coming year offers us an opportunity to meet the needs of the Cherokee people and deliver services and implement new ideas that will improve lives. We will continue to focus on things that make real and lasting impacts in the lives of Cherokee Nation citizens by providing homes, health and hope.
We made a $100 million investment from casino profits to provide better health care for CN citizens. In 2013 and 2014 we broke ground on health centers in Ochelata, Sallisaw, Stilwell and Jay. We are working diligently to complete those new and expanded health centers that will provide service to more than 1 million patient visits in the coming year. In 2015, all four of these health centers will open. The expanded space, coupled with state-of-the-art equipment, allows us to deliver better and faster care.
Another bright spot in our approach to health care was the opening of our new Jack Brown Center in Tahlequah. The center offers world-class therapy and care to troubled Native youths and young adults battling substance abuse. We believe in a holistic approach to health care delivery, and helping young people battle addiction is equally as important as treating other diseases.
Increasing hope for Cherokee families means access to quality jobs. In 2014, Macy’s broke ground on a fulfillment center in Owasso, creating thousands of jobs. With our CN Career Services leading the recruitment effort, CN citizens will fill many of those Macy’s jobs.
Cherokees can be proud of other retail development projects announced in 2014. Cherokee Springs Plaza in Tahlequah is a $170 million development project that will include dining, retail and entertainment and adjoins Cherokee Springs Golf Course. In addition to the permanent jobs created when tenants begin filling retail spaces, Cherokee Springs will create hundreds of construction and support jobs, as development is projected to span a five-year period.
Cherokee Springs Plaza is a nice complement to the upscale retail development we announced in September. We are developing a high-end outlet mall adjoining the Cherokee Hills Golf Club near the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Tulsa. The dining and entertainment options are projected to create 1,000 permanent jobs and hundreds of other jobs during construction. We expect to annually generate $120 million in sales and attract 2 million additional visitors to the area. Our partner, Woodmont Outlets, is spearheading the $80 million development that will increase the number of visitors to Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Tulsa in the coming years.
Cherokee Nation Entertainment broke ground on two casinos is 2014, which will provide hundreds of Cherokee jobs. In Roland, we launched an $80 million project with expanded dining, entertainment and hotel space, which will bring 100 new jobs to the region. In August, we broke ground on the Cherokee Casino South Coffeyville, just south of the Kansas border. This casino will also create 100 jobs in an area that has been left out of CN economic development for too long.
A good job leads to family stability. I’m proud that in 2014, I signed an executive order raising the minimum wage for all CN employees. CNB followed suit by passing a similar resolution. The bump to $9.50 an hour was simply the right thing to do for our employees and our people. We have more Cherokees working for our businesses than ever before, so this increase helps them better meet their families’ needs.
That’s a source of pride for me, just as the expansion of our car tag program is. In June, a compact with the Oklahoma Governor’s Office allowed us to offer car tags for the first time to Cherokees living anywhere in Oklahoma. People said it could not be done, but I’m thankful we were able to achieve this.
In 2014, also saw the CN preserve vital pieces of our culture and history. Bison retuned to the CN through a federal surplus program, and we could not be happier. We have reconnected a piece of our heritage to our bright future. The herd of bison will grow, creating a boon in cultural tourism and other economic development opportunities. The CN was also proactive in working with high tech companies such as Apple, Google and Microsoft to incorporate our language and syllabary across multiple user platforms. This guarantees our language will thrive as people use it to communicate in modern ways such as texting and email.
I am proud of what we have done in 2014 and look to building on these successes in 2015.
As I have said, a good government makes life better for its people and for future generations. When we are healthy and have jobs and home security, we are more hopeful. That is what we are working toward every day for Cherokee people. All these achievements were made possible through the grace of God and because of the team effort of our thousands of dedicated employees, and to them I extend a sincere “wado.”
So on behalf of all those at CN working hard on your behalf, I wish you all the blessings of a happy New Year.
We celebrate Christmas to honor the birth of Jesus Christ and his life of service. The enduring and basic message of his life is one of peace and goodwill towards all. So while the Christmas season is a wonderful time filled with family and friends, it is also the perfect time to reflect on the year and see how we’ve helped our fellow man by emulating the virtues of Jesus Christ.
No matter your circumstances, this is the time of year for each of us to embrace the virtues of charity, righteousness and goodness in each other and in the world. I hope that whatever your burdens and challenges are, the Christmas season will keep your spirits bright and your soul full. The magic of the season is that the world seems brighter with unlimited possibilities. I hope that holds true for you and yours.
As 2014 comes to a close, it’s the ideal moment to count our blessings. Many of our Cherokee citizens have been blessed this past year with additional or improved services. We’ve added more access to better health care, built many safe, affordable houses that our citizens are turning into homes, and are providing greater opportunities for our people to succeed. While the year may not have been perfect, our Cherokee spirit helps all of us rise above any challenge we face. Cherokees are strong and have always been able to look past our trials and come together with friends and family, give of ourselves and share with others, and support those who are truly in need. That’s what makes Christmas extraordinary. That’s the Cherokee way.
I know that we are blessed as a people, and with God on our side, brighter tomorrows are inevitable. More than ever, it is important to share this message of hope and inspiration today. In that spirit of grace, let us reaffirm the values that define us as Cherokee – our community, our unity, our responsibility, our traditions and our love and respect for our fellow Cherokee citizens.
I’ve been taught by our Cherokee elders that we are each other’s keepers, and have been throughout our history. So let us, as Cherokee people, look to the future with renewed courage, conviction and, most importantly, hope. The positive things we do today will have a ripple effect for Cherokees for the next seven generations.
Together, we can foster real growth in our families and communities, we can take shared responsibility for vulnerable children and our tribal elders, and we can keep the true spirit of Christmas – selflessness and compassion – alive in our hearts for Cherokee people in the upcoming year.
I wish you and yours the very best for the season and for prosperity in the New Year. I hope you are surrounded by family and friends and feel merriment and joy this holiday season. And for our troops who are unable to be home for the holidays, I wish them Godspeed and that the New Year brings them safely home to their families.
May God bless each of you this Christmas, and as always, may God continue to bless the Cherokee Nation.
Attorney General Todd Hembree recently released an opinion that wrongly affirmed the two-year term of an Editorial Board member. In doing so, he ignored the will and intent of the Independent Press Act.
The issue provoking the opinion began in January of 2012 when Clarice Doyle, a Cherokee Nation citizen and director at Rogers State University, was appointed to the Editorial Board to replace board member Dan Agent. Doyle was Principal Chief Bill John Baker’s nomination to the board and was unanimously confirmed by the Tribal Council.
Soon after her appointment it was discovered that the appointment resolution was drafted in error. The resolution stated that her board term expired in October of 2014, giving her a term less than the term required. The Act explicitly states: “terms of office of the Board members shall be six years.”
Upon discovery of this error, the board directed me to bring it to the attention of the appropriate authorities in order to correct the mistake. I initially discussed it with Hembree who described it to me as a “scrivener’s error,” which is an inadvertent mistake that changes the meaning of the document but does not occur from reasoning or determination. Hembree assured me he would address the mistake.
Later, I discussed the mistake with Council attorney Dianne Barker-Harrold during a phone call. She said that she was on a business trip in Alaska but that she would look into it when she returned.
I also discussed the mistake with Council Speaker Tina Glory-Jordan during a meeting with her in her law office. I shared with her a copy of Doyle’s appointment resolution and a copy of the Independent Press Act with the relevant language highlighted. She assured me that she would look into it.
The mistake was not corrected despite these assurances.
In September, Doyle was informed by a Cherokee Nation Businesses employee that her term was ending and that she would not be reappointed. Doyle then sent a message to me and the Editorial Board members informing us of her departure from the board.
I contacted Hembree and revisited our earlier discussion. Rather than acknowledging the error, he said that there should be a determination about whether the appointment resolution or the Independent Press Act was the legal authority in determining Doyle’s board term.
I argued that the language in the statute was clear in its intent: Editorial Board members were to serve six-year terms. The only two exceptions provided in the Act were for the initial appointments for Seats 4 and 5 when the board was expanded to five seats in the 2009 amendment to the Act.
However, I reasoned that those exceptions did not apply to Doyle’s appointment because those seats had already been appointed to members Jason Terrell and Robert Thompson, respectively. Doyle was replacing a board member and was entitled to a normal six-year term.
Hembree released his official opinion (2014-CNAG-03) several weeks later. It is an interesting read and I encourage all Cherokee citizens to read it themselves. I have several concerns about its factual accuracy and legal analysis.
The first section, titled “Factual Background,” contains numerous factual errors that are easily corrected with a little bit of legislative research.
In the third paragraph it is stated: “John Shurr was appointed by the three other board members to serve a six year term in April of 2010.”
This is incorrect. Shurr was already seated on the board and was reappointed. Shurr was reappointed by the four other board members: Gerald Wofford, Agent, Terrell and Thompson.
It goes on to state: “With the addition of John Shurr, the Board now had four members.”
This is incorrect. With the reappointment of Shurr, the board had five members.
The paragraph then concludes: "… It appears that no one has been appointed to Seat 5 …"
This is a conclusion derived from the previous incorrect statements. After the Act was amended to add two seats to the Editorial Board, it is reasonable to assume that the next appointment, Terrell, was appointed to fill Seat 4, and the following appointment, Thompson, was appointed to fill Seat 5. Both of these appointments were additions to the board. At the time of Thompson's nomination there was one open seat to fill and it’s reasonable to assume it was the Seat 5 described in the amended Act. Thompson did not replace a seated board member but was an addition to the board. He joined members Wofford, Agent, Shurr and Terrell.
This “factual” background lays the foundation for the next section, “Legal Authority and Analysis.” Curiously, this section does not address or even mention the authority of the Independent Press Act. It is the Act that created the board, and it is the Act that stipulates the requirements, limitations and duties for service on the board. Yet its authority is completely absent in the legal analysis.
Hembree opines that there is no ambiguity in the language of the resolution, therefore it is outside the purview of his office to change the term of the appointed office. He correctly asserts that can only be done by the legislative or judicial branches. The important legal point that he fails to address is whether the unambiguous language of the resolution complies with the will and intent of the Independent Press Act, which specifically governs the board terms.
The Tribal Council spoke when it created and then amended the Act in 2000, 2001, 2005 and 2009. In each version of the statute, the same phrase is present: “The terms of office of the Board members shall be six years.”
The appointment resolution is subservient to the statute, and it is a legal axiom that resolutions must be compliant to the relevant statute.
Hembree’s analysis did not examine the relevant and specific language in the Act necessary to place the resolution in a legal context. By disregarding the authority of the Act, a disservice has been done to the government that enacted it, to the Cherokee people who depend on it for a free press, and to all tribal nations that look toward the Cherokee Nation as a beacon of truthful reporting and good governance.
It is concerning to see the Attorney General issue an opinion based on a flawed and inaccurate background analysis because it is his duty to ensure his legal opinions are true and correct. But as an advocate for an independent Cherokee press, it is truly disturbing for me to then see the authority of the Independent Press Act disregarded in a matter as important as the proper determination of an Editorial Board term.
Our free press is only as strong as the law that protects it, and the law can only protect it if it is enforced. It is important that the people hold our public officials accountable to enforce the Independent Press Act so that our historic legacy of independent journalism and press freedoms are preserved.
<a href="http://www.cherokee.org/Portals/AttorneyGeneral/Docs/opinions/2014-CNAG-03%20Editorial%20Board%20Term%20Limits.pdf" target="_blank">Click here</a> to read Attorney General Todd Hembree’s opinion.
<a href=" http://www.cherokee.org/attorneygeneral/Opinions.aspx" target="_blank">Click here</a> to go to the Office of the Attorney General website.
We’re coming up on what many refer to as the “thankful” part of the year – Thanksgiving and Christmas. I’m sure we’ve all done it. “I’m thankful” for this or that. But my question is how do we ensure our kids are taught to be thankful and understand what gratitude is?
As a parent, I often have trouble getting my 6-year-old boy to express gratitude and thanks. Well, I’ve decided to take this to a new level. They call it “leading by example.” The whole family will be partaking in our “Year of Thankfulness” experiment.
Caden, my son, and I are going to create a “Thankful Expressions box,” all the while, I’m going to be explaining to him the importance of being thankful, what we’ll be doing over the next year and why.
The plan is to write a thankful note each week, including the date, and place it into our box. At the end of each month the family will pull out our notes and read them.
I’m hoping that doing this on a regular basis will keep Caden mindful of what he should be thankful for and over time I’m hoping that his gratitude will grow, develop and mature.
Misty Boyd, a Cherokee Nation Behavioral Health licensed psychologist, said gratitude is one of the more difficult things to teach children and it’s important to practice it regularly, in a concrete way, and over a long period of time.
“Gratitude, like many things, is a skill that develops over time and shifts as we grow. It takes practice to develop that skill, and being positive about any effort your son makes to practice gratitude will help him grow that skill over time,” she said. “I think that many parents and adults find that gratitude is difficult for themselves, which makes it even more difficult to teach to children. However, we’ve become accustomed to expecting ‘quick results’ and may get disappointed when children don’t learn what we’re trying to teach them quickly. We also tend not to practice often enough or long enough for it to ‘stick.’”
Just like children get frustrated, I too find myself frustrated at times and even more so when we enter the dreaded grocery store. It can be trying and aggravating at times when my child asks and almost expects to get something new each time we go. Then I say “no” and the whining ensues.
“Does Caden not remember that toy we bought yesterday?” I ask myself.
“Remember your something special we bought at the store?” I ask him.
“Yes,” he says.
“Can’t you be grateful for that?”
“OMG! Stop throwing a fit and be thankful already about the hundreds of toys you have at home,” I say to myself.
According to Parents.com, it’s important for parents to practice saying no. It’s hard, but let’s practice.
See not too hard. Now sticking to that no is the tough part.
“It's difficult, if not impossible, to feel grateful when your every whim is granted,” a Parents.com article states. “Saying no a lot makes saying yes that much sweeter.”
Another reason that gratitude can seem difficult to teach is that kids think differently from adults because their brains are still developing, Boyd adds.
“They are supposed to think differently than adults think. That means that it’s OK for a young child to be grateful for a new toy from grandma instead of being grateful that grandma came to visit,” she said. “As adults, we value time and relationships but kids may be more focused on the concrete things.”
Here are some tips on promoting gratitude:
• Model gratitude as often as possible.
• Use concrete reminders of gratitude.
• Label gratitude or suggest to kids when it should be felt.
• Praise you child’s efforts while developing the skill.
• Remember to express your gratitude for your child.
I often hear from elders in my family, “kids nowadays don’t appreciate things.” I don’t want to raise a child like that. I encourage everyone, not just parents, to find something that you also can do to improve your gratitude this year.
You’re not alone. We all have many things to be thankful for, myself included. Let us remember them.
On Oct. 6, the U.S. Supreme Court declined appeals from five states seeking to preserve same-sex marriage bans. The court’s decision legalized same-sex marriage in 30 states, including Oklahoma.
Gay couples in Oklahoma began marrying after court clerks started issuing marriage licenses to them. They can now marry in the state’s 77 counties. However, that doesn’t hold true for gay couples wanting to marry under Cherokee Nation law.
Under CN law only heterosexual couples can marry. This goes back to May 2004 when the tribe’s District Court issued a marriage license to CN citizens Kathy E. Reynolds and Dawn L. McKinley. The couple filed for the license after determining the marriage law didn’t specify gender.
The license was granted and the couple married, but court orders barred them from filing it. Legal wrangling and lawsuits ensued, and to this day CN courts have yet to render a decision.
On June 14, 2004, the Tribal Council amended the Marriage and Family Act, defining marriage as one man and one woman “to protect the traditional definition of Marriage.”
Then-Tribal Councilors Bill John Baker, Audra Smoke Connor, Melvina Shotpouch, Meredith Frailey, S. Joe Crittenden, John F. Keener, Jackie Bob Martin, Cara Cowan, Phyliss Yargee, Buel Anglen, David Thornton, William “Bill” Johnson, Don Garvin, Charles “Chuck” Hoskin Sr. and Linda Hughes-O’Leary voted for it. Chad Smith, then principal chief, signed it into law.
I have problems with this law. One is the “traditional definition” of marriage in the CN.
In a lawsuit filed during the same-sex saga, CN Court Administrator Lisa Fields stated her lawyer researched tribal law and history and determined gay marriages were “never contemplated or recognized.”
But Roy Hamilton, a former teacher of the tribe’s history course, states that John Howard Payne, a European-American who lived with the Cherokee to document their customs, mentions a union ceremony to formalize “perpetual friendship” primarily among gay men. Hamilton states oral history paints a picture of gay life among the Cherokee and that they viewed gay marriage as an autonomy right. He states each Cherokee lived his or her life as they liked and no one had a right to interfere in personal choice.
“That would (be) to say they accepted gay people just as any other Cherokee,” Hamilton states.
He adds that “Cherokee marriage pre-European contact was informal and an agreement” between those deciding to co-habitat and perhaps their clans. “No Cherokee married like the European until there was intermarriage and acculturation,” he states.
So Cherokees accepted gay people and gay couples, and marriage was an informal agreement between the people living together. If that’s how Cherokee marriages were, why not let gay couples marry under CN law? But alas, I think what tribal lawmakers in 2004 were referring to was Christian marriage.
According to the June 2004 Tribal Council meeting minutes, Hughes-O’Leary requested the amendment to the Marriage and Family Act and “challenged the Council before the people, God and Jesus Christ what is in the legislation they could vote against.”
Minutes state Martin said he “supports this legislation…as a Christian, a born again believer” and that the “Bible teaches what marriage is.” The record also states that “Garvin as a Baptist deacon said he strongly supports this legislation.”
The problem with their arguments is that the CN is not a theocracy. We don’t govern with the Bible. We govern by our constitution. Not every CN citizen is a Christian. There are some who believe in other religions beside Christianity or no religion at all. We shouldn’t deny rights from our citizens based on religion.
I believe the CN law also defies the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment. I know not all rights afforded in the U.S. Constitution are seen in Indian Country. Look at the First Amendment and its right to free press. In Indian Country, a free press is rare.
However, the 14th Amendment should apply. “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
I see the law against same-sex marriage as depriving gay people the liberty to marry another consenting adult, and it doesn’t provide equal protection. It provides that one set of couples can marry but another set can’t because of sexual orientation.
Individual rights should not be voted upon. That’s what makes them rights. But that’s what happened in 2004 when 15 people voted away a right that’s afforded to straight people but not gay people. Some voted in the name of God. Some probably did so they wouldn’t lose votes. Whatever their reasons, they don’t matter. They took away something that isn’t theirs to take.
Consenting Cherokee adults who are gay can marry in Oklahoma. But the option to marry under CN law should be available to them. The current Tribal Council, or the next, should fix the legislation blocking gay marriage. I don’t see the courts rendering a decision on the case that arose 10 years ago. Something needs to be done. Equality should prevail.